Helping illustrators make what actually sells.

Why we built it

Stock marketplaces are filling with near-identical images faster than buyers' tastes move, and a niche with ten thousand variations already in it pays badly whoever made them. Guessing which topics are still worth the hours wastes the scarcest resource anyone selling their own work has: time.

It started as a ranking — where is the whitespace? — and that ranking is still here. But the question illustrators kept asking was about work they had already finished: why is this set not selling any more? So the tool grew a second half. Point it at your published portfolio and it reads each piece's style, scores the keywords you actually publish, and names the specific problems: pieces sitting in niches that turned three-quarters AI, pairs of your own works splitting one search between them, strong niches nothing of yours mentions.

Both halves run on the same measurements. We read demand from Google Trends, Pinterest and Reddit, compare it against supply and seller competition on Adobe Stock, Shutterstock, iStock and Etsy, and factor in how much of that supply Adobe has flagged as AI-generated. The result is a single opportunity score, tracked over time and mapped to upcoming seasonal events. See every source we read.

Reading your work does not mean keeping it. The full-resolution original is never written down — it is analysed in memory, downscaled, and discarded. What stays are two watermarked copies used to show you your own grid, and they go when you delete the piece.